Skip to main content

Owl limpet

Photo Credit: National Park Service | NPS Photo/Channel Islands

Primary ThreatsPrimary Threats Conditions

Threats and Conservation Status

Overall, limpet populations show a strong increasing trend (4% increase per year explaining 34% of the year-to-year variation). This increasing trend is seen in both the South Coast and Central Coast regions, with the Central Coast exhibiting the strongest increase (5.7% annual increase, explaining 57% of the between-year variation in owl limpet abundances). In addition, recent scientific publications have suggested increasing owl limpet abundances in Northern California, where owl limpets have traditionally been uncommon, are associated with a northward range expansion of these limpets linked to the 2014-2016 marine heatwave.

Although owl limpets are common on Southern and Central California rocky shores, they are at risk of being unsustainably harvested. In some regions recreational fishers can take up to 35 limpets per day. Since the largest limpets are preferred for harvest, their collection is biased towards removing the reproductive females, which can undermine reproductive success. Data show that this selective harvesting has led to a decrease in the average size of these limpets. Harvesting of owl limpets is prohibited in Marine Protected Areas – but even in these areas illegal harvest occurs.

Climate change could also impact owl limpets by increasing the likelihood of desiccation or overheating. Hot temperatures can damage muscle proteins and thereby reduce a limpet’s ability to adhere to the substrate. Heat also alters mucus properties in a way that interferes with adhesion. In spite of the physiological stresses owl limpets may experience with heat overloads, population data do not currently reveal an association between marine heat waves and population declines in owl limpets.

Population Plots

Data Source: The data were obtained from the rocky intertidal sampling locations that are part of MARINe (see https://marine.ucsc.edu/). The MARINe website describes the sampling protocol.

  • Erlandson, J. M., Braje, T. J., Rick, T. C., Jew, N. P., Kennett, D. J., Dwyer, N., ... & Watts, J. (2011). 10,000 years of human predation and size changes in the owl limpet (Lottia gigantea) on San Miguel Island, California. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(5), 1127-1134.
  • Miller, L. P., Harley, C. D., & Denny, M. W. (2009). The role of temperature and desiccation stress in limiting the local‐scale distribution of the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Functional Ecology, 23(4), 756-767.
  • Nielsen, E. S., Walkes, S., Sones, J. L., Fenberg, P. B., Paz‐García, D. A., Cameron, B. B., ... & Bay, R. A. (2024). Pushed waves, trailing edges, and extreme events: Eco‐evolutionary dynamics of a geographic range shift in the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Global Change Biology, 30(7), e17414.
  • Sagarin, R. D., Ambrose, R. F., Becker, B. J., Engle, J. M., Kido, J., Lee, S. F., ... & Roe, C. (2007). Ecological impacts on the limpet Lottia gigantea populations: human pressure over a broad scale on island and mainland intertidal zones. Marine Biology, 150, 399-413.
  • Sanford, E., Sones, J. L., García-Reyes, M., Goddard, J. H., & Largier, J. L. (2019). Widespread shifts in the coastal biota of northern California during the 2014–2016 marine heatwaves. Scientific reports, 9(1), 4216.
  • Stimson, J. (1970). Territorial behavior of the owl limpet, Lottia gigantea. Ecology, 51(1), 113-118.